The Role Of State Administrative Procedure Law In Fulfilling Human Rights In Indonesia

Authors

  • Daulat Nathanael Banjarnahor Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar, Indonesia
  • Kuras Purba Universitas Sari Mutiara, Indonesia
  • Roy Marthen Moonti Universitas Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Gading Benedito Simangunsong Universitas Kristen Satyawacana, Indonesia
  • Albi Ternando Universitas Adiwangsa, Jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68151/jmn.v1i1.2

Keywords:

Procedural Law, State Administrative Court, Human Rights, Administrative Justice

Abstract

The State Administrative Court (PTUN) is an important pillar of the Indonesian judicial system, overseeing government actions to prevent violations of citizens' rights. The procedural law applicable within the PTUN, as stipulated in Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court and its amendments, is designed with specific principles such as the active dominus litis principle of judges, the principle of independent evidence, and the presumption of rechtmatig, which aim to protect the interests of the public when confronted with state power. This paper aims to examine the extent to which PTUN procedural law plays a role in fulfilling and protecting human rights (HAM) in Indonesia, particularly the right to administrative justice and the right to redress for detrimental government actions. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that PTUN procedural law, through its lawsuit mechanism, administrative remedies, the principle of mitigating evidence for the plaintiff, and the authority of judges to decide on delays in the implementation of state administrative decisions, provides an effective legal means for citizens to demand government accountability. However, several challenges remain, including the limited number of disputed matters that can be sued, the lengthy process of executing decisions, and low compliance by state administrative officials with court decisions.

Author Biographies

Kuras Purba, Universitas Sari Mutiara, Indonesia

Universitas Sari Mutiara, Indonesia

Roy Marthen Moonti, Universitas Gorontalo, Indonesia

Universitas Gorontalo, Indonesia

Gading Benedito Simangunsong, Universitas Kristen Satyawacana, Indonesia

Universitas Kristen Satyawacana, Indonesia

Albi Ternando, Universitas Adiwangsa, Jambi, Indonesia

Universitas Adiwangsa, Jambi, Indonesia

References

Ali, I., & Ryan, S. E. (2023). The law and policy of library development: A legal text analysis of Indonesian library bills. Alexandria, 33(1–3), 49–63.

Ali, S. (2025). Juridical Analysis of the Position of PTUN in Resolving State Administrative Disputes. Estudiante Law Journal, 7(2), 317–330.

Andini, O. G., & Boer, M. R. K. (2025). Indonesia’s Safeguarding of Human Rights to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals: Insights from Australia’s Experience. Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI), 3(1), 1–28.

Aneta, Y., Aneta, A., Tohopi, R., Hulinggi, P. A., & Tee-Anastacio, P. A. D. (2025). Legal philosophy’s role in human rights and fiscal governance: Indonesia and the Philippines comparative insights. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 7(2), 437–462.

Ardiansyah, N., Nur, M., & Haeril, H. (2025). The legal-political paradox in granting absolute jurisdiction to the administrative court (PTUN) over the judicial review of abuse of authority in Indonesia. JURNAL SYNTAX IMPERATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 6(3), 392–402.

Asphianto, A., Jaya, B., Wicaksono, A., Ashady, S., Weku, R., Anggita, D., & Risyawan, A. (2026). Balancing International Legal Obligations, Human Rights, and National Interests: Indonesia’s Response to Rohingya Refugees in Aceh. Law Reform: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 22(1).

Bahutala, A. E., Wantu, F. M., & Ahmad, A. (2025). The Contest of Judicial Rationality: An Examination of Judges’ Considerations in PTUN Cases No. 21/G/2022/PTUN. GTO and 19/B/2023/PT. TUN. MDO. Damhil Law Journal, 1(1), 54–69.

Dewi, C. T. I. (2026). Progressive Realization of Human Rights in Climate-Induced Displacement: Assessing Indonesia’s Legal Framework under the ICESCR. Brawijaya Law Journal, 13(1), 147–170.

Evans, M., & Grant, S. (2024). Human rights and civil liberties. AUSTRALIA’S EVOLVING, 53.

Fadeli, T. R. (2025). Indonesia 2025: The «Red-and-White» project and the consolidation of executive dominance. Asia Maior, 36.

Haritjahjono, B., & Herman, K. M. S. (2025). Jurisdictional Transformation of Government Liability Disputes in Indonesia: The Role of the Tax Court. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 3(3), 958–965.

Hidayat, A. A., Arifin, T., Fauzia, I., & Fauzi, R. (2025). Fulfilment of the Right to an Adequate Standard of Living for Workers According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Review of Constitutional Court Decision No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023. Qanuniya: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 1–10.

Irwansyah, I., & Idaman, I. (2026). Application of the Principle of Functional Differentiation Within the Criminal Justice System Framework in Indonesia Through Law Number 20 Of 2025 on The Criminal Procedure Code. Journal of Law, Social Science and Management, 3(1), 20–29.

Jamilah, Z. N., Masnun, M. A., & Tapa, N. F. (2026). Validity of the Governor of East Java’s Discretion in Determining the 2025 Minimum Wage: A Legal Analysis under Indonesian Government Administration Law. Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government, 3(1).

Mangku, D. G. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2019). Indonesia’s Role In Enabling Asean 2025 Masterplants To Promote And Protect Disability Rights In Asean. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 18(4), 1–6.

Maulidyna, S. A. (2025). The Existence of “PTUN” as Judicial Power Institution in Indonesia (A Comparative Study of Institutional Format). Arena Hukum, 18(1), 102–126.

Ningtyas, J. E., Prakoso, H. A., & Deniar, S. M. (2026). Amnesty international Indonesia’s strategy for mainstreaming human rights in the 2024 presidential election campaign. Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik (JISoP), 8(1), 13–27.

Prasetyo, B., Tan, J., & Chan, R. (2025). Implementation of international law principles in Indonesian national law. Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law, 3(1), 11–21.

Ritonga, J. S., Puspita, A. D., Ardiani, C. F., Dewi, E. P., Wardina, K. N., Hasanah, M. D., & Husaini, N. J. (2025). Mewujudkan Keadilan Administratif: Analisis Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 5(1), 538–554.

Satria, E. (2025). From Stagnation to Reform: Administrative Law as a Key to uphold the rule of law in Indonesia: English. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 8(1).

Simanjuntak, V. W., & Waluyo, W. (2025). Education as a human right: An analysis of the compulsory education program as an effort to fulfill the right to education. 1st International Conference on Social Environment Diversity (ICOSEND 2024), 470–475.

Suhardi, M. (2025). Legal Accountability for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Government Administrative Decision-Making in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific Research, 2(03), 100–111.

Sutrsino, A. (2025). Peran hakim dalam mewujudkan due process of law pada sistem peradilan tata usaha negara di Indonesia. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 17–28.

Syam, F., Pebrianto, D. Y., Marsudi, E. B., & Rizki, K. A. (2025). The Role Of Public Policy In Strengthening The Enforcement Of Administrative Law In Indonesia. Progressive Law Review, 7(1), 44–54.

Utomo, S. (2025). The digital age and human rights protection in Indonesia: Legal framework, challenges, and reform directions. Yustisia, 14(2), 225–241.

Wahyuningrum, Y. (2021). A decade of institutionalizing human rights in ASEAN: Progress and challenges. Journal of Human Rights, 20(2), 158–175.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Banjarnahor, D. N., Purba, K., Moonti, R. M., Simangunsong, G. B., & Ternando, A. (2026). The Role Of State Administrative Procedure Law In Fulfilling Human Rights In Indonesia. Journal of Multidisiplinary Nusantara, 1(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.68151/jmn.v1i1.2